Former IMF CFO: Critics aren't saying cryptocurrencies are worthless.

According to economic, Kenneth Saul-w universay, Kennet Tamdeom will not be allowed to have a lot of business as a result of the call. Rogoff is not useful because the call is not supported. If the encrypted phone is proof in some groups of transactions, it's worth the use of the limit. If you have a beneficial news like a neutral exchange, it can be a cost to save means. But there are some important warning. First, there is no business, the encrypted phone is not a good value to store well. Second, since the new version of the call is always possible, without limits because there is no limit, is worthless. But it doesn't want to say no limit because it took a few years to measure the highest quality of new safety. Therefore, long lasting generation encryption calls - more beneficial to something. Whether India must be encrypency currency, "with the main work of payment. But as early as possible The idea of ​​calls is to help you understand what is better against the world payment .. "