Extortion claims against BitMEX were dismissed due to the lengthy "cut and paste".

On September 9, U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick rejected an amendment to the lawsuit brought by traders from HDR Global Trading, the parent company of the September 7 derivatives exchange BitMEX. . Copy and paste into another shirt. In March, Justice Orrick dismissed the previous complaint because it was too late. The court ruled that the previous 237 pages and 600 sentences of the petition were too long, but the change proposed by the plaintiff was 378 pages and over 1,000 more sentences. The judge also found that the amended complaint, including the mismanagement allegations, had been copied and published by another lawsuit against BitMEX in New York. In addition, the applicant was unable to pursue the matter and Orrick denied the request for further variation. In response, the plaintiff's lawyer, Pavel Pogodin, denied the judge's allegation that there were duplicates in the amended complaint and said: “Judge Orrick did not present a case in support of his declaration of equality. .